Newsletters

Criminal Offense of Driving at an Excessive Rate of Speed

A speeding offense constitutes the operation of a motor vehicle at a speed in excess of that permitted under the state statutes, local ordinances, or highway or traffic commission regulations. The typical speed statute prohibits driving in excess of a specified number of miles per hour. In addition to setting forth the specified maximum rate of speed, the speed statutes usually contain provisions prohibiting driving at a speed greater than is ''reasonable and proper'' or ''reasonable and prudent'' under the prevailing conditions or having regard to the actual and potential hazards then existing, or words of similar import.

Criminal Offense of Defective Equipment on a Motor Vehicle

Because an improperly maintained motor vehicle threatens a grave risk of serious bodily harm or death, the maintenance of a vehicle is of the utmost importance to the driving public. The responsibility for minimizing that risk or compensating for the failure to do so properly rests with the person who owns and operates the vehicle. Accordingly, state vehicle codes usually declare that it is unlawful for any person to drive a vehicle unless it is in such safe mechanical condition that its operation on the highway will not endanger the driver, a passenger, or any other person on the highway. Thus, these codes impose a duty upon the operator to see to it that the vehicle is properly equipped as to maintain control and pose no menace to other traffic on the highway.

Overview of Private Motor Vehicle Traffic Regulation

The ability to drive a motor vehicle on a public highway is not a fundamental right under the United States Constitution; it is a revocable privilege that is granted upon compliance with statutory licensing procedures. Whether the right to operate a motor vehicle it is termed a right or a privilege, one's ability to travel on public highways is always subject to reasonable regulation by the state in the valid exercise of its police power. Accordingly, state vehicle codes were promulgated to increase the safety and efficiency of public roadways, and it is viewed as an enhancement rather than an infringement upon a citizen's right to travel. The privilege properly may be revoked for noncompliance, and revocation is not an unconstitutional infringement of the revokee's right to travel.

Admissibility of Blood Alcohol Tests in Drunk Driving Cases

All 50 states and the District of Columbia have enacted statutes requiring a motorist arrested for drunk driving to submit to a chemical blood test. These statutes are known as "implied consent" laws. Under these laws, a motorist suspected of driving under the influence of alcohol is deemed to have consented to a chemical analysis test designed to measure blood alcohol content level.

Defendant's Right to Independent Chemical Test in Drunk Driving Cases

Although a few states have determined that a motorist has a constitutional right to an independent chemical test, that majority of states have provided this right by statute. The right is generally for a motorist to obtain an independent chemical test by a doctor of the motorist's choosing. The most commonly used tests by police officers are the breath tests. However, the privately administered sobriety test given most often is the blood test. Many believe that the blood test will be more favorable to a motorist that a breath test.